Novelist and clinical psychologist Lisa Gornick explores this question — and finds an answer she can live with:
Last year, I wrote an essay about a dark patch in the otherwise largely luminous life of my sixteen-year-old son. When the essay was finished, I showed it to him.
It was Sunday morning. My son put down the newspaper to read the pages I handed him, and I left him alone in the kitchen, busying myself with chores. I was prepared for him to say simply, “No.” Although I’d been discreet in the essay, with a focus on parenting issues rather than him, he was nonetheless a character. On these grounds alone, I imagined he might say “I don’t want you writing about me.” He might worry what his friends or teachers or coaches would think. On a deeper level, he might feel intruded upon: this was his life, his journey. So it was with surprise and relief that I heard his response when I came back into the kitchen.
“It’s fine, Mom.”
“Really? You’re not worried it could have some kind of negative impact on you?”
My son rolled his eyes. “Clear my dishes for me, okay? Luvya.”
A few hours later, we had a disagreement about something that now eludes me but was of the bread and butter variety of whether he should go to the movies with his ninety-nine hours of homework still ahead.
“What right do you have to tell me what to do?” my son snapped. “You’re going to exploit me with that essay.””
I froze. What? the injured parent in me wanted to retort. You told me it was fine. You told me you had no problems with it.
Yes, the observer in me said: here is the truth of what he feels.
Perhaps you are thinking that with these reflections about how I decided not to publish an essay about my son, I am doing precisely what I disavow: writing publicly about him here. But there is, I think, a qualitative difference. My son, in these paragraphs, is what Forster called a “flat” character, defined by one or two traits. Other than the blandest, most stereotypical facts, I have not revealed anything about him.
For many years, I worked as a psychotherapist as well as a writer. During that time, I faced a similar dilemma. Whereas it was clear that patient confidentiality had to be maintained, what about writing about anonymous “case material” in the service of training and theoretical development? Every clinician has to resolve this conflict in his or her own way; as with raising children, there are myriad wrong roads, but no one right road. The road that I chose was not to write about my patients. I feared that the very act of thinking about what transpired with my patients as “material” for something I might be writing would alter the interaction, my attention divided between observing with curiosity so as to better understand my patient and consciously or unconsciously intervening in ways that would advance the story I was trying to tell.
With the essay I showed my son, it became clear that assent and dissent were bundled together. How could he open up to me if he worried that what he told me would end up in print? How could I exhort my son to be careful about the footprints he leaves on Facebook and in texts and emails, then turn around and publish something that later might be taken out of context and used against him in the infinite cyberspace where nothing ever disappears? How could my son feel loved if I used his story — which I know through the privilege of being his parent — for my own purposes?
Sanctimonious as it sounds, we owe our children our sacred trust. We can tell sweet stories about our children when they are babes and young children, but when as adolescents they sail off into what Michael Chabon gorgeously calls “the red light and velvet darkness,” we need to allow them that journey without fear that we will intrude ourselves unnecessarily or force them to live forevermore with their private voyage documented by us. Equally important, our children need to believe that we will let them sail away — that central as they are to us, we don’t need them to be the subject of our work. We can find our own material.
Lisa Gornick is the author of a novel, A Private Sorcery (Algonquin), short stories in various literary quarterlies (including a Best American Short Stories distinguished story of the year), and numerous academic articles. She has a PhD in clinical psychology from Yale and is a graduate of the writing program at NYU, and is currently working on a collection of stories and a novel.
What an insightful reflection on the choices so many of us go through, whether you’re a writer or not. Teenagers don’t even like to think of their parents sharing personal stories about them with friends and family, much less the reading public! Just as observing a scene can alter it with your presence, I agree that the knowledge that you’ve shared your observations of your children changes your interactions with them. Beautiful post, Lisa!
Really wonderful essay.
It’s painful for writers to let go of this wonderful “material” of our children, both in life and writing. After all, we have so much emotional understanding and investment in our kids–it can be hard to separate.
But I agree that there is sacred trust, and once it is violated can we ever win it back?
many thanks,
Laura
Excellent piece. I especially love the way it starts out with the hopeful asking for permission, the assent, and then the realization that it’s not okay after all. I stopped writing about my kids around the time they started being able to write themselves but have often wondered whether I was overly hands-off. I’m glad to feel good about that decision.
I love this essay and I totally agree with your conclusion. Our grown and growing kids should “own” their own material just as they own their own lives.
And who knows, maybe this way when they start writing they just might treat us kindly. If they don’t, well, we’re writers. We have no choice but to understand that’s how these things go.
Thank you Lisa!
Complex issue, beautifully handled
This article has me thinking whether our kids are a special and singular category or whether the hands-off policy needs to extend to siblings, especially younger ones, nieces, nephews, perhaps all of one’s family. I’m in the process of organizing my autobiography and have been wrestling with this. Maybe it has to become a novel instead.
Thanks for posting this. And yes, I agree. Just because we can write about things, doesn’t mean we always should.
Let the piece rest a few years and then dust it off and publish it if he feels ok with it. Anne Lamott did just that with her essay describing an incident with her son Sam. As far as saying you were going to “exploit” him? OMG, that is a sixteen year old trying to get to his mother with a dramatic response after you ruined his life by refusing him the movie …
Lisa Gornick has a valid point here, sort of a psychological knot that’s not so easy to untie once it gets entangled. Obviously, writing about one’s kids is not an activity undertaken in a correct direction. Truth can’t be the only thing that justifies and sustains our writing.
Writing always a multi-dimensional product. It has to be like driving on a busy road where avoiding a lot of things matters more than the desire to reach the destination. We can’t maim or kill others in our haste to arrive !
When about oneself, one can always afford to write with greater liberty and candour, and without any attendant heavy cost unlike writing about one’s own kids that may involve a staggering and irretrievable cost at several levels.
A very engaging piece of writing ! Loved it.